What differs
- Offering: HackerOne sells H1 AI Red Teaming as 15- or 30-day engagements that can launch in about one week; Bugcrowd sells AI penetration testing in Basic, Standard, Plus, and Max tiers, plus crowd-powered AI red teaming and AI bias assessments.
- Framework mapping: HackerOne maps findings to OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications, and MITRE ATLAS; Bugcrowd’s AI pen test methodology checks the OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, and its page does not name MITRE ATLAS.
- Agents and retesting: HackerOne’s page covers agents, tool integrations, and retesting of remediation; Bugcrowd’s AI pen test page lists retesting in the Plus tier and does not describe agents as a tested target.
- Published evidence: both list SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP in their trust centers; Bugcrowd also lists CREST.
- Pricing: neither publishes prices.
Who each tends to fit
Teams that need agent coverage and MITRE ATLAS IDs in a fixed-length engagement may look first at HackerOne’s published scope. Teams that want tiered pen test options or an ongoing crowd program may look at Bugcrowd. Ask both for a sample report.
Last checked: . No winner declared.