MethodologyUpdated Nov 8, 2026

How we research and present vendors

17 vendors · 53 primary sources · 0 paid placements · re-checked at least every 90 days.

What we include

Companies that sell adversarial testing of LLMs, agents, or AI applications, either as human-led engagements or as automated red-teaming platforms, and that have an active public website and a public product or service page for this work.

Sources

Each fact comes from the vendor’s own website, documentation, trust portal, or a primary release such as a company announcement or financial results. Every profile lists its sources and the date we checked them.

What we do not do

We do not test vendors, score them, rank them, or publish reviews. We do not claim partnerships or customer relationships we cannot source. Where a vendor publishes no price, we say “Contact vendor”. Where we found no certification, we say so and suggest asking for documentation; that is not a finding that the vendor lacks one.

Certifications

Listed as the vendor states them. Scope can differ by product, parent company, or subsidiary, so we recommend requesting reports.

Ownership

Where a vendor has been acquired, or has announced an agreement to be acquired, we state that from the acquirer’s or vendor’s own release and the date it gives.

Order

Vendor lists default to alphabetical order. Filters and comparisons change only what is shown, not any ranking.

Updates

We re-check sources at least every 90 days and when vendors announce material changes.

Commercial policy

Today we accept no payment for listings or placement. If sponsorship is introduced later, sponsored items will be labeled, kept out of editorial comparisons and filters’ default order, and disclosed on this page.